|
April 30 2012 delayed
FreeVenue public release of Jan 30th MemberVenue guidance ~ Over the
past 90 days, the avg/median home price fell $400/week in Canada,
£200/week in the UK, $200/week in Australia and $100/week in the
USA. The USA realty bubble been in "over-correction mode"
since Sept/2010. Thus, its annual median home price ended 2011
actually 5% ($8,000) below the long-term Price/Family-Income ratio
trend. In turn, Australia, Canada & the UK face a prolonged
stifling of economic activity due to the assault on disposable
incomes by the weight of home mortgages and rent. When one
adds in the burden of cumulative high petroleum costs, the
fundamentals are in place for Technical Recessions in all three
jurisdictions.
Families most at risk are in the UK
where the avg home is overpriced by 120%. The Australian
median home is currently 81% overpriced. Canada's housing
bubble finally burst in June 2011. The avg Canadian home is
32% overpriced and valued at 2.2 x's its American counterpart. As
such, the Canadian economy saw monthly contractions in February, April, May & November and the
TRENDLines Recession Indicator
currently projects sub
3% GDP thru to its 2017Q4 horizon.
The Conservative Federal Gov't & Bank
of Canada talking points have been blaming the Japanese earthquake, EURO
troubles & Justin Bieber for the ailing domestic economy, but CMHC is clearly at fault for this
situation. Canada was the last G-20 nation to fall into
Recession in 2008 and the first one out ... not by clever
fiscal/monetary policy but because CMHC was enabling the domestic
realty bubble by condoning 5% minimum downpayments for its high-ratio
mortgage insurance coverage. As such, the housing bubble
financed Canada's false good fortune. The present economic downturn is
solely a "made-in-Canada" malaise and was foretold in
this venue as far back as March 24 2010.
It is scandalous the measure
continues in place and Canadian taxpayers are clearly at risk.
CMHC expects the Canadian taxpayer will bailout any major insurance
losses it incurs as was done in the USA with FannieMae & FreddieMac. If there is any sense of accountability in Ottawa, look for heads to
roll at CMHC. Why? The following was CMHC's response to my
on-going analysis in their Q3 Financial Statement release
(2011/11/29):
"At the moment, there is little evidence of a significant
over-valuation in the Canadian housing market overall, although some
centres warrant close monitoring. CMHC expects housing markets to
stabilize next year, and house prices to grow modestly going
forward." (scroll to see wall of shame
below)
Canada's
Realty Bubble a record $87k
in
2011 ...
over double USA counterpart
The Canadian avg home price detached from the
long-term Price/Family-Income ratio of 2.7 way back in 2002.
The onset of record low interest rates shortly thereafter enabled
consumers to buy more expensive homes w/o increasing their mortgage
payments. Subsequent irrational exuberance swept the P/FI
ratio to an unsustainable bubble high of 3.6 in 2011.
The year-to-date
annualized price of $361k is 32% ($87k) above the trend line and a
record 120% premium over the $164k American counterpart. As
shown by trajectory in chart#1 and assuming a 2011 Peak, it is
probable new highs will not be set 'til 2019. Using monthly data, last month's $348k avg national
price is down $29k (-8%) from the $377k record high back in May 2011.
Home prices fell by $400/week over the last 90 days.
|
|
Australia's Realty Bubble declines $12k
to
$184k
in
2011
Australia's median home price
detached from the long-term Price/Family-Income ratio of 2.1 way
back in 1997. The onset of record low interest rates shortly
thereafter enabled consumers to buy more expensive homes w/o
increasing their mortgage payments. Subsequent irrational
exuberance swept the P/FI ratio to an unsustainable bubble high of
4.8 in 2007.
The year-to-date annual median price
for 2011 is $411k. 2007 is considered the Bubble Peak as Price
in that year was 128% ($241k) above the P/FI ratio trend. The
same metric infers median price should be only $227k this year.
As shown by trajectory in the chart, it is probable new highs for
median Home Price will not be set 'til 2027. In summary, the
Australian realty bubble was $184k (81%) over trend & 3.8 P/FI ratio
in December 2011. Using monthly data, last month's $405k
median national price is down $25k (6%) from the $430k high back in
2007.
Home prices fell by $200/week over the last 90 days.
UK's Realty Bubble declines
£2k
to
£90k
in
2011 ... UK Homes overpriced
by
120%
The UK average home price detached
from the long-term Price/Family-Income ratio of 1.9 way back in
1997. The onset of record low interest rates shortly
thereafter enabled consumers to buy more expensive homes w/o
increasing their mortgage payments. Subsequent irrational
exuberance swept the P/FI ratio to an unsustainable bubble high of
4.9 in 2007.
When the annual price peaked in 2007
@ £181k, it was £111k (157%) above the trend line. As shown by
trajectory in chart#1, it is probable that new highs will not be set
'til 2056. In summary, the UK realty bubble was £90k (120%
over trend & 4.2 P/FI ratio) in December. Using monthly
data, last month's £165 avg national price is down £21k (11%) from
the £186 high back in October 2007.
Home prices fell by £200/week over the last 90 days.
USA's Realty Bubble declines $14k
in
2011 (overshot by $8k) ... New Home
Price down $2k
& attains Equilibrium
New Homes:
Record low interest rates coming out
of the 2001 Recession enabled consumers to buy more expensive New
Homes w/o increasing their mortgage payments. Pro
home-ownership incentives plus the pent-up demand caused median
price to quickly detach from the long term Price/Family-Income ratio
of 2.6 in 2002. As slack lending guidelines and outright fraud
became entrenched, irrational exuberance took the P/FI ratio to an
unsustainable high of 3.1 in 2005. Annual median price rose to
$241k in 2005. Despite still rising for two more years, I
consider 2005 as the Bubble Peak as the 2005 price was a record 26%
($50k) above the trend line.
As seen in chart#2
above, the year-to-date annual New Home Price ($226k) is $0k below
the 2011 target of $226k. More importantly with regards to the
economic recovery, annualized seasonally adjusted (SAAR) unit sales had recovered to 408K by
Aug 2009 from the 336k low in January of that year. Sales
plunged to a troubling five-decade low of 278k pace in the August
2010 pause, but had recovered (17%) to a 324k pace last month. To add context
however,
the build pace during the 2005 high was 1.4 million units/yr.
As shown by the chart trajectory, it is unlikely the New Home median
price will set new annual highs 'til 2015. In summary, the USA
New Home realty bubble was $0k (0%) below trend & 2.6 P/FI ratio in
December 2011.
Using monthly data, last month's $217k median price was $13k
(6%) above the 7-yr low in Oct/2010, but is still $46k (17%) below
the all time high of $263k back in March 2007.
New Home prices fell by $0/week over the last 90 days.
Existing
Homes:
Record low interest rates coming out of the
2001 Recession enabled consumers to buy more expensive Existing
Homes w/o increasing their mortgage payments. Pro
home-ownership incentives added to pent-up demand caused median
price to quickly detach from the long-term Price/Family-Income ratio
of 2.0 starting in Y2k. As slack lending guidelines and
outright fraud became entrenched, irrational exuberance took the
P/FI ratio to an unsustainable bubble high of 2.8 in 2005. The
annual median price rose to $219k in 2005. Despite still
rising for another year, 2005 is considered the bubble peak as the
2005 price was a record 34% ($74k) above the trend line. It
had appeared a correction was virtually complete by January 2009,
but a new low in February 2011 made it apparent median price was
exhibiting a
classic "return to the mean".
As seen in the charts
above, this year's median Existing Home Price ($164k) is $8k below
the 2011 target of $172k. More importantly with regards to the
economic recovery, (SAAR) unit sales had quickly improved 19%
from the January 2009 sub-trough, but then relapsed to a
multi-decade low during the general July 2010 pause. Unit
sales have since rebounded 40%. To add context however, the
last month's sales pace of 4.61 million units/yr is far
below the 5.4 mu/yr pace in late 2009. As shown by trajectory
in the chart, it is probable new annual highs for Existing Home
median price will not be set 'til 2021. In summary, the USA
Existing Home Realty Bubble was $8k (-5%) below trend & 1.9 P/FI
ratio in December 2011.
Using monthly data, last month's $165k median price was $8k (5%)
above the recent 9-yr low in Feb/2011, but is still down $64k (-28%)
from the all time high of $229k back in June 2007. At its
worst point, home price had crashed 32% to $156k.
Home prices fell by $100/week over the last 90 days.
USA Backgrounder
(rev 2010/10/29) ~
In May 2008, TrendLines
Research published guidance that the correction of the USA Housing
Bubble would neither be as drastic as forecasts painted by
self-appointed pundits, nor would it be the non-event as
rationalized by voices in the media openly declaring the USA housing
market was not in a bubble, Our scenarios predicted the collapse
would only be as severe as needed to return the USA's median
Existing & New Home Prices to their Price/2-earner Family Income
ratio trend lines.
Shortly thereafter (2008/11/18),
McDoomer Nouriel Roubini was predicting a 40% collapse in
housing prices and that 1,400 banks would "go bust in 2009".
Well, he was out by 1,260 on the latter call, and to date, existing
home prices have declined only 28%. A growingly tabloid-style
mainstream media seems obsessed with extreme positions.
Following a long time
commitment to Home Price/Family Income ratios to measure real estate
bubbles, our first publicly available effort illustrated Existing
Homes were inflated by $74k (51%) at the bubble's crest. Based
on our experience with the Canadian Real Estate Bubble of the 90's,
we speculated prices would decline 'til at least 2017, and there
would be no new American highs set 'til 2029. But to our
amazement, the classic
"return to the mean" did not even come close to mirroring the
Canada episode, and the correction for both New & Existing Homes was
virtually complete by January 2009. It was no coincidence the
economic Recovery commenced the following month ... long before any
fiscal stimulus cheques.
While waiting for the realty
sector (and general economy) to correct (recover) completely, we had
been awaiting four bottoms. The first two were Existing Home
transactions/month & Existing Home Median Prices. Done ...
January & January (2009) respectively. The remaining pair were
New Home monthly sales & Prices. Done ... January & March
(2009) respectively. An increase in monthly transactions was
important to the Economy 'cuz it brings on increased revenues via
purchases of furnishings, appliances, landscaping/gardening,
With respect to New Homes, rising sales also mean "jobs".
The passing of the bottom of
Prices for both categories is important 'cuz the subsequent apparent
increase in "wealth effect" affects consumer demand and durable
goods sales. As the economic Recovery took hold, New Home
Price rebounded 10% within 20 weeks of the March 2009 low.
Existing Home sales rose 27% from the January 2009 bottom by the
following July.
A return to the mean is both
natural and necessary for economic stability. In the early
80's & 90's, we twice saw the Fed raise rates to embattle the
Inflation cycle. An upward effect on mortgage rates left less
Disposable Income for consumers to spend on holidays, clothing,
durable goods, etc ... and Recessions ensued. The purpose was
to quell overheating economies. And it worked.
Due to winterization costs,
Canadians spend an average 2.7 x's 2-earner Family Income for their
residences, compared to a 1.9 factor in the USA. Analysis
reveals avg Home Price in both nations detached from the home
price/family income ratio trend line after 1999 (see charts) along
with avg New Home Price. Lower interest rates made upgrade
purchases almost painless. Then irrational exuberance set
in...
In 2001 the Fed lowered
interest rates to draw the Economy out of its Technical Recession.
Many consumers, recently burned by the Dotcom fiasco, began to
invest heavily in Real Estate rather than the volatile, collapsing
Stock Market. Low interest rates enabled the purchase of more
expensive homes for the same monthly servicing cost, even w/o an
increase in Family Income ... and housing inflated. At the
same time, new sub-prime mortgages flourished, compounded by rampant
fraud by buyers, mtg brokers, appraisers, lawyers, lenders, mtg
aggregators, investment banks and bond rating agencies.
Artificial Demand was greater than Supply, and the Realty Bubble was
under way. As Existing Home Prices attained levels of 2.8 x's
Median Family Income, it was all to clear that irrational exuberance
was fuelling the frenzy.
The USA norm for Median
Existing Home Price is only 1.9x's the median of 2-earner
Family Income. With extraordinarily higher prices, many
families were drawing from their Disposable Income to pay higher
monthly mortgage payments. This left less funds for family
budget spending on holidays, clothing, durable goods, vehicles, etc.
Coming out of the Recession, mortgage interest rates began to rise.
Add to the fray the higher energy costs for transportation and
heating fuel that was in play, and we had the recipe for a Severe
Recession. The Fed recognized this scenario unfolding and
attempted a succession of lower Interest Rates to keep the Economy
humming ... but alas, could not avert negative GDP.
The realty correction plunge
was unexpectedly swift ... much faster than we originally forecast,
and resulted in a return to the trend line in January 2009 using
monthly data. It is no accident that the Severe Recession came
to an abrupt end in July ... prior to delivery of the first fiscal
policy stimulus cheques. Nasty real estate & mortgage
practices caused the economic contraction, and the return to norms
also helped in getting out of the downturn by restoring Confidence.
The financial liquidity crisis & record petroleum costs were just a
shove over the edge. |
|
"There is No Real Estate
Bubble in Canada" ~ Wall of Shame
As mentioned above,
there exists in Canada an extraordinary denial of the housing
bubble. We have seen these rationalizations of unsustainably
high prices in North America before: 1989 Canada with its 55%
($53k) episode & the USA's 34% ($74k) event in 2005.
Here are some of the
current members of our Wall of Shame:
- Royal Lepage (Phil
Soper, President & CEO - 2012/1/10) "In the recovery period
following the 2008-2009 recession, I found myself repeatedly
speaking of ‘irrational exuberance’ in the Canadian housing market.
Expectations were too high and the pace of expansion unsustainable.
With this report, I find myself in exactly the opposite position.
Widespread calls for a major real estate correction in 2012 simply
can’t be justified. The industry has significant momentum entering
the year, and is buoyed by the stimulative effect of very low
interest rates; we expect the market to continue to expand — albeit
at a slower pace. I expect a 2.8% increase in housing prices
nationwide." - Winnipeg Sun
- CMHC
(Q3 Financial Statements - 2011/11/29) "Analysis suggests
house prices are in line with demographic changes and economic
growth. CMHC, in consultation with the Bank of Canada and the
Department of Finance, is continuing to refine models and techniques
used to help identify risks of house price bubbles. At the
moment, there is little evidence of a significant over-valuation in
the Canadian housing market overall, although some centres warrant
close monitoring. CMHC expects housing markets to stabilize
next year, and house prices to grow modestly going forward". - Globe
& Mail
- RBC
(Robert Hogue, senior economist - 2011/11/15) "The average
price of a detached bungalow is forecast to rise in all regions,
expect B.C. alone, where prices are projected to slip by 1.7 per
cent." - Globe&Mail
- CMHC
(Mathieu Laberge, Deputy Chief Economist - 2011/11/04) "House
prices and sales will remain stable through 2012. In its
fourth quarter outlook, CMHC predicts the average price will
increase 1.2% from $363,900 in 2011 to $368,200 in 2012.
Despite continued uncertainty in the global economy, Canada’s
economic fundamentals remain positive, particularly with respect to
interest rates, employment and immigration, These factors will
continue to support Canada’s housing sector in 2012.” -
CanadianRealEstateMagazine.ca
- Canadian Real Estate
Assoc (Gregory Klump, CREA Chief Economist - 2011/10/15)
“Canada’s housing market remains stable amid continuing financial
market volatility, contributing to Canadians’ confidence in the
economy and providing support for Canadian economic growth.” -
CREA.ca
- Gov't
of Canada (Jim Flaherty, Federal Finance Minister - 2011/10/6)
"The country's housing market has cooled somewhat but there's no
clear evidence of a bubble at this point, not planning any further
moves to cool the real estate market down" - Globe & Mail, NYC
- Royal Lepage
(Phil Soper, President - 2011/10/05) "A broader slowdown is
expected in the months ahead but fears of a U.S.-style correction
are completely unfounded" - CBC.ca
- BMO Capital Markets
(2011/3/3) "There should be no major correction if going
forward prices stay in line with income growth." - CBC.ca
- Bank
of Canada (Paul Jenkins, Senior Deputy Governor - 2010/2/22)
"I would certainly not say we are looking at a housing bubble" -
Global Business Leaders Day panel discussion sponsored by Gov't of
Canada & Financial Times, via Vancouver Sun
- BMO Capital Markets
(Michael Gregory - 2010/2/15) "He also concludes that
there's no bubble and, furthermore, that there is very little chance
one will appear. His prediction: talk of a housing
bubble, which has become bit of a bubble itself, should deflate by
summer" - Vancouver Sun
- Bank of Canada
(Timothy Lane, Deputy Governor - 2010/1/11) "It is
premature to talk about a bubble in Canadian housing markets" -
Financial Post
- Gov't of Canada
(Jim Flaherty, Federal Finance Minister - 2009/12/21) "We
always watch the housing market to make sure that we do not see the
development of an asset bubble. Record Canadian home prices
partly reflect a stabilizing economy and don't constitute a bubble
right now" - Bloomberg
- Gov't of Canada
(Jim Flaherty, Federal Finance Minister - 2009/7/16) "There
is no bubble in the Canadian housing sector. That has not been
our concern" - Calgary Chamber of Commerce speech, via Reuters
- BMO Financial Group
(Paul Ferley, Asst Chief Economist - 2005/8/11) "The rise
in housing prices over the past several years does not reflect a
housing market bubble. The rise is indicative of strong
underlying economic fundamentals." - Real Estate Monthly Online |
Canada Backgrounder (rev
2011/8/31)
~
TrendLines Research first
drew attention to the topic of Canadian Housing Bubbles in 1989.
Although that particular Bubble was only $53k, it was actually a
more severe event as the average price of the time was an
unprecedented 55% above the Price/Income ratio long term trend ...
almost double the current episode (29%). Families were paying
an astonishing 4.2 x's their Income.
Rather than the recent rapid
3-year correction (-22%) witnessed in the USA (annual figures),
average home price fell a mere 6% in our first realty bubble.
It took ten long years for the Canadian average price to surpass the
1989 high. Considering the momentum in play within the present
economic Recovery, it is not unreasonable to expect a repeat of that
long-term sideways correction ... with perhaps an absence of new
highs 'til 2017. To no avail, Trendlines Research has been
recommending (since March 24 2010) to CMHC that it would be prudent
to temporarily increase its down-payment requirements for high-ratio
insured mortgages to 10% (from 5%) until the downside risk
dissipates.
This recommended action may be difficult in an
environment where economists for four of Canada's largest banks have
been unequivocal in recent weeks that "there
is no real estate bubble in Canada".
They join the Gov't of Canada and the Bank of Canada (see our Wall
of Shame below) in their reassuring albeit misrepresentative
rhetoric. We heard their same chorus of rationalizations in
1989 & from their counterparts south of the 49th in 2005! Both
events posed an assault on the Disposable Income of consumers, and
wealth effect ramifications resulted in imminent Recessions within
twenty-four months in both instances. As elaborated in our
Canadian
Recession Meter,
failure by the Bank of
Canada & CMHC to address a winding down of the Canadian Housing
Bubble could easily be a barrier to paring back the Unemployment
Rate.
|