I'm
pleased to tell TRENDLiners this past Winter 82% of visitors
were International (113 nations: most from USA, UK,
Argentina, Australia, France, Italy, Spain, Austria, Germany & Hong
Kong)
clik to follow
(@TrendlinesDotCa) for new chart alerts
Scroll down forBarrel
Meter charts
... click right-pane links for related graphs
=
posted
to the
FreeVenue in the last 30 days.
FreeVenue charts are generally posted 90-days after the guidance release
@ the
MemberVenue (latter may sport supplementary
charts, tables, archive & enhanced discussion)
~90 days too long
to wait? View our current guidance charts via: (a)
$16/month Quarterly access or (b) Annual-membership special of
$10/month or (c) $50 project-fee
scroll to page bottom &
see our guidance a year ago:
"Dec/2010" chart!
Price
Components of USA contract Crude Oil
The
Barrel Meter
offers a visual depiction of Trendlines
Research's analysis of the price components of the monthly avg for
the three dozen weighted blends comprising USA contract crude oil as
monitored by EIA. The detailed study of the forcings affecting
Crude Price from 1999 to 2007 allowed Trendlines Research to provide
real-time guidance and dissection of the factors in play during the
historic 2008 spike. The importing of future Surplus Capacity
& Extraction Cost stats from my
Peak Scenario-2500
production profile model into the
Barrel Meter
enabled development of an outlook module capable of forecasting
component prices on a 23 year+ horizon.
Dissection of USA contract
Crude Price spikes -
using the
TRENDLines Barrel Meter,
it is possible to dissect the $92 spike (from Dec/2004) to
its $129/barrel PEAK (July 2008) & collapse back to $37
(Jan/2009):
Price Components
$129 PEAK
$92
SPIKE
$37 TROUGH
$105 Dec/2011
Windfall Profits (fear-premium)
$34
$33
$
1
$40
Speculation/Hedging Activity
$
3
$
-1
$
4
$
6
US
$ Debasement
$30
$28
$
2
$16
Inventory Draw
$
9
$
6
$
3
$
7
Lack of Surplus Capacity
$23
$21
$
3
$10
Extraction
Cost (weighted)
$30
$
6
$24
$26
Archive
(MemberVenue only)
of Barrel
Meter charts: 2012 2011 2010 2009
2008
The TRENDLines Price
Targets are based on our projections of future Extraction Cost,
USDollar Debasement, Speculation/Hedging Activity,
Inventory Draws, Lack of global Surplus Capacity & effects of the Media noise du jour
(fear factor) on Windfall Profits. These forcings change on a daily basis due to geologic, geopolitical
& weather related factors and may cause significant revisions in
future monthly updates. The foundation for much of this data
is derived from both the Peak
Scenario-2500
(oil depletion model) and
Gas Pump
(economic model).
~
Crude could Spike to
$148 if Hormuz Blockaded
April 24 2012 delayed FreeVenue public release of Jan 24th MemberVenue
guidance ~
The USA contract crude price averaged $105 in December, down $3 over
the last thirty days ... 32% over its
$79/barrel Fundamentals Fair Value. USA Contract Crude is the
volume weighted avg of three dozen grades and blends produced in
and/or imported to the USA.
Typically this can
range from a 10% discount for Canada Heavy to a 20% premium for Malaysia
Tapis Light. Confidence levels suggest the monthly avg could
exhibit a trading range spanning $78 to $113/barrel thru the balance
of Q1 & Q2.
Global production has increased dramatically from the Recession
low of 83.1 Mbd (Jan/2009), setting yet another monthly record (90.2-Mbd) in
Dec/2011 and a new quarterly record
of 89.5 Mbd (2011Q4). The oil sector pace has shattered last year's
annual record with a new mark of 87.4-Mbd and monthly production
is poised to break the 95-Mbd threshold in 2015 & the 100-Mbd marker in 2028.
At this time, it appears the
natural GEOLOGIC
PEAK of 105-Mbd in 2030 is likely to be
pre-empted by PEAK DEMAND of 100-Mbd in 2029 upon crude oil
surpassing $213/barrel.
Not only was 2011 impressive for the scale of
global production, but it stands as a hallmark year for Saudi
Arabian extraction ... setting its own new monthly, quarterly &
annual records. In so doing, Saudi claims of its massive
Surplus Capacity have been validated as bona fide ...
stunning and shocking the purveyors of imminent Peak Oil (whom I
fondly call McPeaksters) for the third time in five years
(2006/2008/2011). Geopolitical events in Libya & Iran have
drawn the Kingdom back to its reluctant role as swing producer.
Yet again, traders were forced to acknowledge they were very wrong to adopt the
McPeakster allegations of terminal decline.
Six of the seven major All Liquids streams are in growth
mode. Conventional Regular Oil (light sweet crude) peaked in
2005 and will plateau for twelve years. Int'l
Inventories are presently near their 5-yr avg and 5% of global capacity is
presently idle, eagerly awaiting new Demand from non-OECD
nations. OECD consumption peaked in 2005.
Improving
fundamentals, declining Windfall Profits and resolution of concern
over Iran over the next several months should drive Crude Price down to $73
over the next 12 months and to $63 in 24 months. Perceived cyclicality within the fundamentals leads
me to expect the 2008 & 2011 spikes to be duplicated with future crests in 2016,
2020 & 2023. Fear my
Barrel Meter
forecast of coming highs won't come to fruition may lead the more nervous and
vulnerable OPEC members to again break quota discipline whilst
publicly calling for intervention via production cuts at their scheduled June 2012
conference - and thereafter.
FFV Chart Inset
~ The dashed red
line
in the chart above depicts the "fair value"
of crude oil considering
its fundamentals: worldwide Extraction Costs (production
weighted), lack of global Surplus Capacity, international Inventory
Draws (vs build) & US$ Debasement. In general, Crude Price (red
line) tracks
reasonably close to oil's Fundamentals Fair Value.
The
chart inset tracks variance from FFV. Significant exceptions
were: (a) the 71% premium during the 1999/Y2k OPEC cutback;
(b) a 54% premium in the lead-up to the Iraq2 invasion; and (c) the
-22% deficiency in Dec/2008 at the depth of the Great Recession.
This unique FFV
analysis serves to crystallize my consistent (and controversial)
position that the historic July 2008 price spike was "not a
Bubble". The inset graph clearly reveals the $129/barrel
(monthly avg) peak Crude Price was indeed in equilibrium during that
volatile period. The
price components table (above right) dissects the Crude Price
forcings for both the 2008 spike and today.
The inset further
illustrates Crude Price took on its own variety of irrational
exuberance within mere weeks after the ultimate $37/barrel
correction trough in Jan/2009. Only ten months later the
detachment from FFV had attained a lofty inexplicable 36% premium - a
level not seen since late 2002. Producers were rewarded with
obscene record reported earnings during this 4 quarter spree.
Price discovery was utterly non-existent.
Surprisingly, at the worst point of this episode only $5 of the $74 Crude
Price was attributable to spec/hedging activity. Currency
Debasement added another $10. This spike was heavily media
driven (cable news induced fear-factor), as evidenced by a near-record
$29/barrel assessed to Windfall Profits at that juncture.
One would have
expected the juices to flow to new heights with the start of MENA
geopolitical activity, especially considering faux rage in
Barack H Obama's speeches. But, the
Barrel
Meter reveals
only $15 of the April 2011 price high ($113) is traceable to NATO
strikes in Libya. It is little known another $10 of the $39 price
increase was attributable to USDollar Debasement related to his
Deficit & National Debt woes. From Inauguration Day to today,
devaluation is responsible for an accumulated $15/barrel (36¢/gal
pump) in Crude Prices.
It is very evident a sea change in pricing
discovery is underway. In the six years from 2003 to 2008, Crude
Price varied an avg 9& from oil's FFV. Since then, the variance has
been 23%.
1-Yr
Target
~ In summary, concern over a global recession, speculation/hedging
regulation reforms and improving fundamentals should lead to Crude Price
falling to $78 by May ... en route to the 1-yr target
of $73/barrel (Jan/2013).
5-Yr Target
~ Looking down the road, the
Barrel Meter
forecasts Crude Price to trough @ $63 in Jan/2014, then commence a
new spike event resulting in a near-record $127 high in 2016 and an eventual 2017 target of
$110/barrel.
10-Yr Target
~ Ever-rising Extraction Costs and continued USDollar volatility
surrounding uncertainty with respect to America's determination to
finally addresses its
Debt Wall
could lead Crude Price to record highs in a fourth spike event ($138
record in 2020).
Assuming oil sector best practices results in the traditional pace
of development of Reserves and maintenance of 5-Mbd avg Surplus
Capacity, Crude Price is projected to settle back to a more
reasonable 2022 target of $117/barrel.
2035 Target (see
chart below) ~ A fifth and final currency inspired spike event ($180
record) is forecast for 2023. Permanent triple-digit Crude
Prices after 2021
induce many forms of demand destruction leading to ultimate
Peak Demand
of 100-Mbd in 2029 upon surpassing $213/barrel. Ever-rising costs for the marginal barrel
are the main forcing. Above-trend mini spikes will occur
whenever
Surplus Capacity falls below 4-Mbd. Probable business cycle
Recessions in 2017 & 2026 may give short respites but waning USA
dominance over time will result in its downturns having decreasing adverse effects on
global GDP.
The
Barrel Meter
projects rising Crude
Price will be stymied by the Demand Destruction Barrier and will culminate in a record $363/barrel
- the 2035 target.
Oil/GDP Ratios
~ The natural business-as-usual production scenario would have seen
All Liquids form a GEOLOGIC PEAK of 105-Mbd in 2030.
But starting in 2004, the long-term trend for the growth rate of
global Consumption began to wane. Triple-digit crude costs are
causing demand destruction. Consumers, commerce & institutions are
substituting and conserving. I have found this change has
economic consequences that are predictable at four definitive petroleum/GDP
ratios. These invisible lines generally rise with time and
GDP. Three have global implications and one is unique to the
USA.
PEAK Demand Barrier ~ This first identifiable line is the
Crude Price threshold which while surpassed blocks the setting of
new global Consumption records. It was recently triggered @
$90/barrel in early 2008 and again @ $99 in early 2011. During
three temporary incursions since 1980, global Demand was held at bay
while Crude Price surged. This petroleum/GDP ratio is
represented by $103 today and was responsible for the absence of new
monthly Consumption records since Dec/2010. Admittedly there
have been a series of Production records, but balance surpluses have
resulted in stock builds. Resolution of geopolitical factors
and a subsequent receding of USA Contract Crude Price back below
$103 should result in the resumption of new Demand records.
These PDB transgressions and temporary
suspension of Demand records could occur in the future, particularly
during the model's forecast spike. But eventually, this line-in-the-sand will be encroached
permanently. The failure of Crude Price to retreat back below
this delineation will mark All Liquids PEAK DEMAND.
Inventory builds will induce a coincident topping of global production: PEAK
OIL. At this time, the
Barrel Meter
model projects this event will occur in 2029 upon Crude Price
surpassing $213/barrel (see BM-2035 chart). I discovered the
PEAK Demand Barrier only recently and its first reference was in the
Oct/2011 Peak Scenario-2500 update, whilst its first annotation
within the Barrel Meter
chart was in the Nov/2011 version.
G-20 Recessions Threshold
~ TRENDLiners are quite familiar with this marker. Annotations
within the
Barrel Meter
chart
since
Jan/2010
have alerted the threshold past which higher
petroleum prices would induce (or augment) a second round of
economic Recessions among this global community of
nations. Record oil costs no doubt assisted in pushing
weakened G-20 economies past their tipping points in 1980 as central
banks waged a war on inflation via high interest rate monetary
policy. But
2008 marked the first time a significant round of G-20 Recession was induced by
cumulative or "baked-in" high petroleum prices.
Its definitive Petroleum/GDP
ratio was marked by $106/barrel in early 2008 and was at the verge
of claiming victims once again in early 2011 as Crude Price climbed
to $113 ... a whisker away from the $116 marker at that juncture.
Several G-20 nations (Australia, Canada, France, Japan & UK) indeed experienced at
least one monthly and/or quarterly Real GDP contraction during the brief spike.
In fact this offers up some explanation for the utter shock suffered
by most Economists when it was revealed USA GDP had collapsed to
o.4% in 2011Q1. The threshold stood at $121 in December.
As seen in today's chart, this G-20 metric is not expected to come
into play again 'til crude surpasses $278/barrel in 2032.
Demand Destruction Barrier ~ When Crude Price spikes, certain vulnerable sectors of the global
economy find it necessary exercise significant conservation measures
such as scale backs, shuttering, switching to alternative energies
or resorting to substitutions.
Barrel Meter
analysis has identified two clear stages for this phenomenon known
as demand destruction.
The
Nov/2009
Barrel Meter
chart was the first to identify
discovery of the Demand Destruction Barrier - a definitive
Petroleum/GDP ratio whereby Crude Price can no longer rise due to a
virtual evaporation of bids. There have been two episodes:
1980 & 2008. The DDB
halted the July 2008 price run @ $129/barrel (monthly avg - USA
contract crude). The DDB is currently $146 (note this ceiling
wrt Iranian nuclear facility strike by Israel) and based on GDP
projections would be instrumental in holding Crude Price to $372 in
2035.
USA Light Vehicle Sales Barrier
~
The American economy is too diversified and per
capita incomes too high to be adversely affected by the early stages
of the aforementioned G-20 Recession Threshold. That said, my
Gas Pump
model did detect way back in April 2010 a very
similar phenomenon. Chart annotations illustrate a
Gasoline/GDP ratio at which the auto sector noticeably breaks down.
USA Light Vehicle Sales have collapsed four times upon breaching
this threshold: 1980, 1990, 2007Q4 & March/2011. The
Barrier was $3.35/gal in December and the (blue) FRB chart below illustrates
an auto sector resurgence has accompanied the Autumn downturn in
pump prices.
The Great Recession saw volume collapse from a 16
million unit annual rate to 9 mu/yr. Sales had rebounded to
13.2 mu/yr by Feb-2011, but dropped back to an 11.5 mu/yr pace in
June as the auto sector again suffered pump price
shock. Now that gas is back to $3.33 and below the LVSB, it is probable sales will
climb above the 14
mu/yr pace in January or February.
The
Gas Pump
chart also annotates a Demand Destruction Barrier marking the
ceiling at which gasoline price spikes will reverse. It was
instrumental in blocking the July 2008 event @ $4.11/gallon and
stands @ $4.37 today (again, note this if Israeli fighters take
flight or Hormuz is blockaded). The
Barrel Meter
had also been cautioning (since
Nov/2009) of the LVSB, but with its tight proximity to the
PEAK Demand Barrier, it was deleted due to the deemed greater
importance of the latter to Peak Oil discussions.
The
Trendlines Recession Indicator
calculates cumulative high petroleum prices
over past Quarters caused a 1.0% headwind against the USA GDP growth
rate in December. The previous high for this negative GDP
forcing (set way back in Oct/2008) was just exceeded in October.
It will take the USA & other G-20 economies a couple of years to
shake out the "baked-in" dampening effect.
Price Discovery
~
There are over three dozen grades of oil across the globe.
Long ago, most were sold on long-term contracts via fixed price
lists. Saudi Aramco maintains this method. Today,
oil is often sold at a discount/premium to several standard blends,
facilitated by consulting assistance from Platts.
Unfortunately, a new crop of mostly neophyte buyers have been found
to be quite vulnerable to media noise (fear factor). This has
led to an era of irrational exuberance with respect to Crude
pricing over the last four years.
Less than 20% of
crude is transacted on the WTI/Brent spot venues. Most of the
stakeholder activity there involves hedging. An increasing
trend is to contract some grades @ the front or second month of
futures. For the most part, futures contracts are side bets to
guessing final outcomes ... akin to sports betting. My
research has consistently revealed that in periods of increased
volumes (eg March 2011), these activities can add as much as
$9/barrel to Crude Prices.
Similarly, the
myth of "imminent Peak Oil" has been the oil sector's best friend
since the first of many annual declarations in 1989. Enabled
by the WWWeb, the proponents of this hoax (McPeaksters) have provided the marketplace with dozens
of outages and outright disinformation each week since 2003.
Their inferior forecasts have discredited them in the eyes of
politicians, policymakers and the media, yet their influence in
pushing up Crude Prices at every turn is evident. Their
ability to nuance fear factor goes straight to the bottom line in
the form of Windfall Profits to Producers worldwide.
Failed Forecasts
~ The McPeakster blogosphere was burning up once again last Winter
in anticipation of Steven Kopits (Douglas-Westwood) forecast of an
American and worldwide economic Recessions upon Crude Price
exceeding $86/barrel. Kopits subscribes to the myth propagated
by associate
economist James
Hamilton (Univ of California) that high oil prices
were the main cause ten of the last eleven Recessions.
They both appear
unaware correlation does not always imply causation.
To fully understand his present frame of mind, Kopits recently
(2011/10/10) posted on Hamilton's blog: "We will look back in
maybe 10 to 15 years and see that we are/were in the midst of a
second and Greater Depression." Now just throw in David
Rosenberg and I'm not sure if we have the three blind mice ... or
three stooges.
Crude oil is a
miniscule portion of the consumer price index in most nations and
the breach of the $86/barrel threshold passed unceremoniously in
Spring 2011.
The
IMF has since reported Q2 GDP grew at a robust 3.7% pace.
As discussed above, the
Barrel Meter
model long ago addressed this forcing and found
only when Crude Price breaches the definitive Petroleum/GDP ratio
(represented currently by $121/barrel) would there be headwinds
sufficient to result in a new round of oil cost induced G-20 Recessions.
As did Colin
Campbell before him, Kopits appeared before the USA House of
Representatives Energy Subcommittee (2011/2/18) to fear-monger the
outcome of Crude Price surpassing his $86/barrel line-in-the-sand.
He could have avoided subsequent embarrassment of his impotent
screaming and handwaving had he learned from many of the same
analysis errors made three years prior by James
Hamilton.
As a neophyte to the oil
sector, Hamilton had adopted absurd assumptions relayed to him by
the McPeakster fraternity with respect to alleged inadequate global
surplus capacity, questionable annual new capacity build potential
and over-the-top UDRO (underlying decline rate observed) assessments
that were all terribly wrong.
If that wasn't enuf,
James Hamilton's failure to recognize USDollar debasement as one of
the largest forcings of price spikes spoke volumes to the ultimate
demise of his prediction the rise in oil prices was linear. In
an Aug-2011 update to his own Peak Oil study, Chris Skrebowski has
adopted the same linear price growth assumption and predicts Peak
Demand will occur upon the Brent Crude Price exceeding $135/barrel in 2014.
McDoomers
~ There continues to be absolutely no merit to the cornucopia of
pundit predictions (Feb/2011) for $200-$250 oil & $5-$7 gasoline by
the Summer of 2011 disseminated by the lamestream media,
McPeaksters & McDoomers. We heard all the same
rationalizations in the Summer of 2008 and our COPF
chart (below) is testament to similarly hysterical musings.
Conversely, there was
no hint of a MENA geopolitical event back in April-2010 when this
year's spike episode with a founding on USDollar devaluation was
initially
foretold by TRENDLines!
the OPEC Conundrum
~ Since 2006 it has been increasingly noticeable that any
price hikes hinged to OPEC quota cuts can be measured in mere days
or weeks ... not months or years. There are two main reasons
for the fade.
While responsible members of the block abide to lower quota, there
is a small and defiant group of serial cheaters who shirk the
guidelines. This includes Iran & Venezuela. They are the
loudest calling for the cuts, then defiant in failing to honour
themselves for they desperately seek revenues to buoy their failing
economies.
Trendlines Research has found yet another factor albeit quite
counter-intuitive. It is one that can be blamed on the
successful disinformation campaign waged by the fringe movement
promoting "imminent" Peak Oil: McPeaksters. Starting
with virtually annual declarations (from 1989) that global oil
production had already peaked, their proactive actions became much
more aggressive in 2002.
Along with Extraction Costs
and USDollar Debasement, crude price fundamentals include components
for Inventory Draw & Surplus Capacity. When OPEC tightens
quota restrictions, this immediately puts pressure on global
inventories and Price moves upward - about $2/barrel per 1-Mbd of
reduced quota. Unfortunately for OPEC, the
Barrel Meter
model has discovered that desired price increases are more than
offset over extended time by the traders who rightly realize the
collective action means the world now has (more) defined spare
capacity and this factor becomes a negative forcing on gross crude
price: approx $4/barrel for each 1-mbd increase in apparent
idle capacity.
In short, I argue that for
every 1-Mbd of trimmed quota, Crude Price eventually declines
$2/barrel. OPEC cuts inadvertently create (additional) Surplus
Capacity into a marketplace where many neophyte buyers had assumed
there was none (due to McPeakster alarmism).
~
Highlights
projected 2012 low:
$78/barrel in May
next
"potential spike" past record $129/barrel:
Aug/2015
PEAK DEMAND: 2029
upon oil breaching $213/barrel
potential oil-induced G-20
Recessions: 2032 upon crude breaching $278/barrel
projected ultimate record
high:
$363/barrel 2035
Trendlines Research Price Targets
2012/1/24
Assumptions
Supply
Surplus
Capacity
Avg Cost
Extraction
Jan/2013 1-Yr Target:
$73/barrel
89 Mbd
6 Mbd
$28/barrel
Jan/2017 5-Yr Target:
$110
96 Mbd
5 Mbd
$37
Jan/2022 10-Yr Target:
$117
98 Mbd
5 Mbd
$61
2035 Target (24 years)
$363
98 Mbd
5 Mbd
$204
~
These
targets for import-weighted USA contract crude are based on our
projections of future Extraction Cost, USDollar Debasement,
Speculation/Hedging Activity, Inventory Draw, Lack of Surplus
Capacity & the Media Noise-du-Jour "fear-factor" effects on Windfall
Profits. These forcings change on a daily basis due to
geologic, geopolitical & weather related data and may cause
significant revisions to our projections with succeeding monthly
updates. The foundation for much of this data is derived from
Peak Scenario-2500
- our peak oil depletion model.
~
For comparative
purposes, all projections are
re-based to EIA's import-weighted USA Contract Price (nominal
USDollars/barrel), approx 2% above WTI. Its July 2008 peak of
$129 was followed by a Jan/2009 bottom of $37/barrel. WTI has
been a playground for neophyte speculation for several years and as
such WTI can be 11% higher to 27% less than the USA Contract Price
and thus is useless as a research metric. The USA Contract
Price, comprising dozens of blends & grades, is slightly higher than
OPEC's basket but somewhat less than Brent.
Barrel Meter Compared to
13 Recognized Long-Term 2035 Crude Oil Price
Forecasts
March 24 2012 delayed FreeVenue
public release of Dec 24th guidance @ our MemberVenue ~ Today's
chart compares the
Trendlines Barrel Meter
monthly revision to updated annual price outlooks by Adam
Sieminski of Deutsche Bank, EIA,
IEA, OPEC, Boone Pickens & Chris Skrebowski.
A new annotation added
to the chart today is Freddy Hutter's "Peak Demand Barrier".
In Oct/2011 it was proposed in his
TrendLines Barrel Meter model
that global oil consumption ceases to grow when
the USA contract crude price exceeds this definitive Petroleum/GDP
ratio. The thesis further suggests the natural Geologic Peak
of 103-Mbd in 2031 will be pre-empted by Peak Demand upon permanent
breach of the PDB threshold in 2029 when oil surpasses $213/barrel
hence holding consumption to the 100-Mbd at that juncture.
The
Barrel Meter
has been unique in its tracking of oil fundamentals as components of
crude price since 1999. The recent update calculates today's
$103 price to be a 27% premium over crude's Fundamental Fair Value. US$ Debasement
since early 2009 remains a $15 price component. This new
revision proposes spiking activity in 2008 & 2011 is related to
newborn cyclicity within oil fundamentals and additional spikes can
be expected in 2015, 2018 & 2021.
The
Barrel Meter currently
forecasts that failing either any major geopolitical event or OPEC
intervention at their June convention, much improving fundamentals
should see oil decline to $63 by Sept/2012. It maintains a
price ceiling to any spiking activity of the monthly avg exists as
represented by another definitive Petroleum/GDP ratio ... the Demand
Destruction Barrier.
Between these two lines is the price point (currently $121) which
can induce economic Recessions among the G-20 nations (as occurred
in 2009). The
Trendlines
Gas Pump
reveals a similar critical price level - the USA Light Vehicle Sales
Barrier - the price at which rising gasoline prices cause collapse
in the auto manufacturing sector. This occurred in 1980, 1990,
2007 & Spring 2011. It is $3.37/gallon ($102/barrel oil)
today.
The
Barrel Meter
imports data on projected extraction costs,
spare production capacity & business cycles from the
Peak Scenario 2500
depletion model. A similar analysis for
gasoline price is featured via the
Gas Pump
presentation.
March 15 2011 ~
Today's chart updates price outlooks by Deutsche Bank, EIA,
IEA & Trendlines. Extraordinary
consistency revealed in the updates by Adam Sieminski of
Deutsche Bank ($192),
EIA AEO 2011 ($200) & IEA WEO 2010 ($204).
Nov 4 2010 ~ Today's
chart introduces
OPEC's long-term price outlook. It forecasts crude will
average $80 to 2020, then rise to $106/barrel by 2030.
Oct 4 2010 ~ Today's chart introduces a medium term forecast by
Charles Maxwell. His $287 per barrel in 2012Q2 target is
in significant breach our Demand Destruction Barrier.
Sept 2 2010 ~ Today's chart
introduces long term forecasts by Robert Hirsch &
Michael Smith. Both practitioners have also ventured Peak
Oil predictions, featured in our
Tier-2 presentations.
Hirsch's $478 per barrel in 2013Q2 & Smith's $239 in 2019 both
significantly breach our Demand Destruction Barrier.
July 13 2010 ~ Today's chart replaces
EIA's AEO with its IEO 2010, raising the 2035 target to $224
from $204/barrel.
April 12 2010 ~ We're pleased to add a contribution by IHS to
our Crude Oil Price Forecasts presentation. Authored by Mary
Novak, it is by far the most conservative of the long-term
studies with a 2030 target of only $111/barrel.
Jan 10 2010 ~ We've inserted what the
Barrel Meter
describes as a significant reference threshold
- the Demand Destruction Barrier
(DDB). It demarks the apparent Oil-Cost/GDP ratio where rising
prices are inevitably reversed by sea changes in user conservation
and substitution. This invisible ceiling halted the epic 2008
spike at $131/barrel.
Dec 14 2009
Backgrounder ~ As we introduce Adam Sieminski's price study,
it mirrors our sentiment that current crude prices are poised for at
least a 15% downward correction to better reflect underlying
fundamentals. The chief energy economist of Deutsche Bank
(Washington) projects contract prices to reach $182/barrel by 2035. Seeing the global
Recession subsiding more quickly, IEA
bumped up its 2015 forecast seven bucks to $73 this week.
Their long term targets mostly skim a tad below Deutsche Bank,
rising to $158 by 2030. EIA
released its 2010 AEO in mid-December. Converse to IEA, its
path straddles above the Deutsche Bank course, rising to $203 in
2035.
Disagreement that a constraint
mechanism such as the Demand Destruction Barrier exists separates
conventional price forecasting from those within the McPeakster
fraternity. For illustration purposes, we include their six
showcase predictions to demonstrate the divergence. Monthly
updates by a "joker" over at theOilDrum (aka Ace) have been
trimmed recently, but still warn the cult following of a spike to
$188/barrel within 40 months! From here, we deteriorate to
contributions by two members of
the Lunatic Fringe:
Jeff Rubin (ex-CIBC World Markets) foresees "sustained pricing"
of $215 by 2012 &
Matt Simmons (deceased investment banker) sports infamous speculation of
$300 by 2014 & $573/barrel ($600 WTI) in "much less than 20
years". Candidates for membership include Robert
Hirsch & Boone Pickens with guestimates of $478 & $500 within only a
couple of years. A final significant breacher is Charles
Maxwell.
Trendlines Research
has assisted many stakeholders recognize that All Liquids will enjoy
an ever increasing pace for approx two decades, to be followed by a
very manageable Post Peak decline. With a return to healthy
Surplus Capacity, Marginal costs are irrelevant at this time and
thus assures a reasonable pricing regime. Knowledge of these
two factors allows policy makers to conduct their research and due
diligence and make long term decisions in a less hurried
environment.
If your firm/institution requires
written validation of a future price forecast in the 60-day to
40-year time frame,
feel free to contact our
analyst,
Freddy Hutter
(867.660.5566 in the Pacific time
zone)
~
BACKGROUNDER excerpts (2011/10/13)
~ Crude Price will permanently encroach the Light Vehicle Sales
Collapse Threshold in 2028. It is at this juncture policy
makers and stakeholders must aim all their efforts to have
infrastructure in place for the transition away from all-dominating
gasoline/diesel transportation fleets.
Excepting the
2008 spike event, most demand destruction on Crude Price's
upward journey is quickly mopped up by eager emerging markets.
As Crude Price breaches the LVSCT ($192/barrel & $6.98/gal pump) for
the final time, Peak Demand will prevail and stymie forever the
increasing production of All Liquids.
Not accidently,
my
Peak
Scenario-2500
oil depletion model currently projects maximum
production will occur upon a Demand Peak of 100 Mbd in 2029 ... not
the 2037 Geologic Peak of 110 Mbd based on the current trend of
converting proved reserves to new capacity.
The benefit of a
Demand-inspired scenario is its positive influence on maintaining
global Surplus Capacity norms in Saudi Arabia, Russia, Brazil and
elsewhere. My analysis reveals approaching minimal spare
capacity levels is the most critical forcing is raising Crude Prices
today and over the next two decades. Peak Oil will only be a
problem if its unfolding results in drastic stock draws and waning
idle capacity to the extent it causes price shocks.
BACKGROUNDER
excerpts (2011/8/13) ~ The $131/barrel monthly record was
set in July 2008. The current price run is actually the
culmination of a secular trend commencing June-2004. At that
time the secular devaluation of the USDollar which had started
Jan-2002 finally began to be factored in as a price component of
Crude Price by frustrated stakeholders. By July 2008,
compensation for US$ Debasement comprised $31 of Crude Price (see
table - above right).
The bursting of
the USA's housing bubble led directly to the financial crisis by
exposing the subprime mortgage fiasco. The irony of the matter
is that by March 2009 (just weeks after the Recession trough), the
USDollar had regained virtually all its loss as the international
investment community ironically sought safe haven in American
treasury notes. Upon inauguration of Barack Hussein Obama, US$
Debasement was in remission: a mere $1 component of Crude
Price.
In early 2009,
Wall Street & the White House took glee in shining a light on
Deficit & Sovereign Debt to GDP ratios of a plethora of
jurisdictions. The lamestream media
were enablers in focusing on the ills of Iceland, Dubai, Ireland,
Greece, Portugal, Hungary, Spain & Italy. Inevitably when they
ran out of nations, the same scrutiny was finally applied on the US
Federal Gov't. Just as savvy currency traders had lost faith
in Congress ability to address its long-term
Structural Deficits in 2002, now the international investment
community is being clued in and taking stock of the USA's own
fundamentals - and the secular decline of the USDollar has
resumed...
As a component
of Crude Price, USDollar Debasement was only $2/barrel in January
2009 after the USA's first celebrity President was inaugurated.
Growing unease with the socialist leanings of his Administration led
to the Debasement factor running up as high as $12 over several
quarters. A pause occurred in the Summer of 2010 when it
appeared the CBO had convinced the President & Congress to let the
Bush-era Tax Cuts expire in December. This sentiment was so
entrenched that our own Barrel Meter extinguished its forecast of a
$141 2011 spike in September 2010. And the Debasement factor
drifted back to $9.
Unfortunately,
the mid-term Elections intervened and irresponsible electioneering
reversed the momentum via promotion of an extension of the Bush-era
Tax Cuts as a means to maintain fiscal stimulus in the face of a
phantom double-dip. The Trendlines Recession Indicator
sported the earliest alerts of a potential downturn but had already
dismissed a renewed contraction by its Sept/2010 outlook. But,
facts were not allowed to ruin strategic campaign rhetoric.
The Tea Party won big in November.
Regardless of a newly
Republican-dominated House of Representatives, Congress severely
disappointed the international investment community by its
irresponsible disposition of the Bush-era Tax Cuts by extending them
fully intact ... even for the top 1%. The Obama Administration
then added to the disgust with its own proposal of a $1.5 trillion
Deficit 2011 Budget ... and the Debasement factor rocketed to
$24 by April.
There is an assumption in
today's update of the Barrel Meter that the USDollar will continue
to decline 'til the international investment community is satisfied
a sea change in legislative attitude towards the structural deficit
prevails. The November 2012 Elections should present itself as
that critical opportunity.
In a perfect storm of events
Crude Price would have a tendency to rocket to $163 in September,
but the model has high confidence a late Summer spike would be
blocked by the same Demand Destruction Barrier (DDB) that firmly
arrested the 2008 price run @ $131/barrel ($4.11/gal pump).
The negative effects of rising energy costs on the disposable income
of consumers and the profits and viability of businesses and
institutions eventually takes a toll against the economy. The
DDB represents a definitive Crude-Cost/GDP ratio ($138/bbl &
$4.34/gal) where certain feedbacks come to fruition. As
happened in the Summer of 2008, Demand will be reversed as
alternative energies, substitutes and conservation measures are
pursued.
BACKGROUNDER
excerpts (2011/7/13) ~ The June short-term price outlook
projected an imminent $136 spike. Today that target is knocked
down by $20 and Americans can give thanx to the Tea Party for this
development. Their stalwart position on forcing fellow
Republicans to make expenditure cuts a condition to raising the Debt
Ceiling has at least temporarily truncated the coming currency
crisis. The outcome of these negotiations will be clear by
August 2nd and the magnitude of the eventual agreement with Obama
will determine the course of the secular debasement of the USDollar
... and Crude Price. In our analysis, oil will fall $4/barrel
per each $1 trillion in spending cuts and/or new tax revenues within
the Debt Limit disposition. Unfortunately, stubborn positions
taken by the Obama-Democrats at this juncture are signalling a lost
opportunity to pare back the $23/barrel Debasement component.
The IEA
marketplace injection of 60 million barrels over 90-days will be
found to be grossly underwhelming when the bulk of withdrawals
commence in early August. My analysis suggests 120 mb/month is
required to force a $10/barrel decline in Crude Price; a 150
mb/month injection to move Price by $20/barrel. Saudi Arabia
has already boosted production by almost 1-mbd and as such
TRENDLines projects the multi-month price run should terminate @
$116 in August and quickly dissipate.
Since
Dec 2009, Trendlines Research had warned
Crude Price was re-approaching a definitive Oil-Cost/GDP ratio which
decimated Light Vehicle Sales in 1980, 1990 & 2007. Upon
surpassing $90/barrel in early February 2010, oil again breached
this critical threshold and as seen in the (right pane) chart, the
post-Recession rebound of New Car & Light Truck sales are in
reversal from the 13.3 million unit pace. New 2011 sales highs
are improbable 'til Crude Price dips below $90 in Q4.
Barrel Meter
analysis of the current nine-month $32 spike
attributes $12 to USDollar Debasement, $6 due to lesser Surplus
Capacity, $2 for higher Extraction costs & $1/barrel for tighter
Inventories. The balance is associated with non-fundamentals:
$3 for increased Speculation/Hedging activity & $8 to Windfall
Profits that take advantage of subtle media-driven fear factors (of
which $7 is MENA-geopolitics related).
BACKGROUNDER
excerpts (2011/6/9) ~ As such, our renewed forecast of a
record Crude Price spike this month assumes the present pause will
extinguish upon bond and currency vigilantes dismissing genuine
intent by Congress & the President to resolve the Entitlement issues
which are foundation to the Federal Govt's
Structural
Deficits and future Debt Wall.
This currency crisis will be
opportune in inspiring a "Tea Party Intervention". Their input
conditions will result in successful disposition of the raising of
the Federal Debt Ceiling by addressing the long standing Budget &
Entitlement issues. At this time it appears they will insist
on demanding a dollar in future cuts for every dollar of increase to
the Debt Limit. If successful, the US$ will correct
precipitously on this welcome news. Unless the Debt Limit
negotiations lead to an unexpected short-term agreement, Crude Price
will fall to $63/barrel in 12 months.
BACKGROUNDER
excerpts (2011/4/9) ~ Logic was absent from the
marketplace. Price discovery was dysfunctional. It
appeared neophytes had taken control of buyer desks of the globe's
stakeholders. It was an era of irrational exuberance
with respect to Crude pricing.
BACKGROUNDER
excerpts (2011/2/8) ~ This resumption of the US$'s secular
decline (since 2002) is attributable to the failure of Congress to
address its structural deficits as shown once again by the decision
to extend all of the Bush tax cuts. The pace of the Debasement
may increase significantly in the coming weeks as international
investors and sovereigns digest the ramifications of the "Moment of
Truth Report" recommendations by the National Commission on Fiscal
Responsibility & Reform being shunned by President Obama.
2008 SPIKE BACKGROUNDER (rev 2010/8/10) ~
2.4mbd of new capacity was required
to offset 2009 global Underlying Decline Observed.
Fortunately, the energy sector has been bringing much more than that
on stream each year ... a record 4.7-mbd of new capacity last year,
as seen in
Peak Scenario-2500
Chart#4's
inset. The explosion in new facility development late this
decade is one of several factors responsible for the recent
$94/barrel collapse in the monthly average of the USA Contract Crude
Price. Regardless of OPEC quota antics in latter 2008, savvy
market traders ignored these quota cuts and instead reacted to the
more important revelation that "real" and abundant Surplus Capacity
was returning to the global system.
From October 2006 to July 2008, the
McPeakster fraternity was successful in
originating/disseminating web-based rumours that Saudi Arabia's
Ghawar giant field was in terminal decline. PeakOildotcom,
theOilDrum, Matt Simmons & Jeff Rubin (CIBC WM) were the main
players that wrongly translated a reversal of Saudi extraction to be
a harbinger of overall global decline.
But, as the Kingdom increased
production from 8.7-mbd to 9.5, the hoax by these perpetrators was
exposed. Prices plummeted as traders raced to eliminate their
silly Depletion Fear Premium as a pricing component. At
the height of the July 2008 Price Bubble, the later invalidated FEAR
factor had rose to $35 of the $131/barrel contract price.
Embarrassed Producers were the grateful beneficiary of this
manipulated situation, as witnessed by their burgeoning windfall
profits. Indeed, the 22 year old rumour of Peak Oil is the
best damned thing that has ever happened to the crude producing
sector.
The combination of the Russian
incursion into Georgia and the record purchase of American Treasury
securities/instruments during the 2008 Summer Credit Crisis led to a
20% jump in the USDollar. With this, geopolitical events thus
eliminated almost the entire $31/barrel Dollar Debasement component
that had built up in July 2008.
Another volatile forcing behind the
2008 Crude Spike was related to the perceived growing tightness in
Surplus Capacity. Albeit there was still 2-mbd apparently
available, much was not useful as since mid-decade there had been an
even greater tightness in spare refinery capacity - and what there
was, could not handle the heavier crudes available.
The result
was that the Surplus Capacity component of Price inflated to $29 in
the Summer of 2008. Today, traders understand that global
surplus capacity exceeds 6-mbd.
Average Upstream costs (exploration &
lift) also had accelerated growth of late. On a production
weighted basis, this was a $24 component that heady season.
Inventory tightness varies mostly on a seasonal basis, and sat at $9
per barrel at that crucial juncture.
The final remaining factor concerns
the controversial speculation-hedging activity. It prodded the
spot price rise in two ways: (a) by the sheer total futures
contracts volume, and (b) via non-commercial long contracts vs the
shorts. Contrary to overwhelming popular opinion, our research
attributes only $3/barrel to this activity at the peak of the
bubble.
Futures contracts are
mere side bets to the real action ... and can no more affect the
Crude Price than sports betting can affect ball game scores.
It does not significantly impede the process of price discovery, but
the glamour surrounding the activity evidenced by noise-du-jour
most certainly can lead to excessive windfall profits for the
producers.
A
record of 307 thousand long futures contracts was set in early
April, compared to 259k volume in March 2008. A record
non-commercial (long/short) contracts volume of 493k was set as well
(in early June), much above the 453k level of May 2008. The
net volume (longs minus shorts) set a new record of 135k in January,
substantially more than 2008's high mark of 100k.
Together, the above
factors served to spike up the Price $94 from its level of
$37/barrel at January 2005. In five short months (by late
December 2008), it had collapsed to that same $37 level. To
understand the mechanisms behind the topping action, it should be
known that as the oil price approached a certain Fuel or Oil
Cost/GDP ratio which I call the Demand Destruction Barrier,
alternative & conservation measures kicked in to halt the Price
inflation. Until then, high prices played a part in enhancing
(but not causing) the Recession in play.
The 2009 Recession was inspired by
the real estate bubble and its derogatory effect on disposable
income. In a normal business cycle, even inflated fuel costs
are too insignificant to cause economic Recessions. Another
McPeakster myth busted: correlation does not prove causation.
Logic is absent from the
present marketplace. Price discovery is dysfunctional.
Intuition would infer neophytes have taken control of buyer desks of
the globe's stakeholders. Contrary to 2008, when the oil price
was attributable to factors surrounding its fundamental components,
crude price has been in a bubble since August 2009. I repeat
... 2008 was not a bubble!
The most positive outcome of this last episode was the
extinguishing of an overly generous Lack of Surplus Capacity premium
along with the dispelling of Peak Oil rumours.
~
My guidance a year ago:
<<< Dec 1 2010 chart
predicted USA contract would rise from $80 in 1 year to $84
(Dec/2011 actual as above is $105)
I'm pleased
to tell TRENDLiners this past Winter 82% of visitors were
International (113 nations: most from USA, UK,
Argentina, Australia, France, Italy, Spain, Austria, Germany & Hong Kong)
clik to follow
(@TrendlinesDotCa) for new chart alerts
Trendlines
Research
... Long-Term multidisciplinary Perspectives by Freddy Hutter